The X-Men Movies’ Alternate History Lessons
When the first X-Men movie dropped into theaters back in 2000, with a modest budget and few stars, few could have predicted the unbelievable cultural impact that the film would have. Back then a sequel wasn’t a sure thing, but Bryan Singer’s little mutant sci-fi film paved the way for superhero cinema as we know it today. Since then, Fox has released nine more movies in the X-Men universe, culminating in Logan — a tense, heartbreaking finale to the X-Men as we know them, finally bringing the series full circle. Throughout these films, the series has weaved together a complex continuity, with characters that grow old, change, die, and inspire others.
There have certainly been continuity errors throughout the X-Men series. Unlike the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the X-Men films weren’t planned out in advance, so mistakes were made along the way. But in the long road from X-Men to Logan, a fascinating, mutant-influenced alternate history has been developed, full of intriguing divergences from our own version of history — along with similarities that call attention to our greatest societal mistakes. The X-Men’s mutant conflicts have always been used as a political allegory for real life issues, and the movies have taken this to the next level, through the use of prequels, back stories, and peeks into the future, with major events tied to specific dates.
But this raises an interesting question: if one lived in the X-Men movie universe, and was sitting in Logan’s history class as a student of Charles Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters, what sort of lessons would they be learning?
Alternative History Lessons
Since the X-Men movies were not made in chronological order, it requires some work to put the X-Men history book together. And their history, of course, isn’t over: while we now have a definite endpoint in the future of 2029, there’s plenty of still unknown time between then and the 1990s, when the next X-Men sequel will come out. But since Logan tells the story of a day when the X-Men are no more, and thus gives us a conclusion, we can now look over the entire alternate history of this movie universe from the beginning until now.
All of the best alternate history theories pivot around a single change, and how that one change impacts everything. You know, the butterfly effect. What would happen if the Nazis won WWII? How would today’s music scene be different if Kurt Cobain hadn’t committed suicide? The key is to start with one change, drop that single stone into the river, and watch the ripples spread.
In the X-Men universe, that single change to the timeline is easy to pinpoint: the existence of mutants.
Lesson #1: Ancient Egypt & Apocalypse
So, how would history students study Apocalypse?- what would the textbooks say? In the pre-Days of Future Past timeline, he never rose up again, so he would likely be viewed as a mythological god, discussed in the same chapter as Ra, Anubis, and Set.
Really, there’s no way that En Sabah Nur wouldn’t be a major mythological figure that history students would write papers on. After all, the guy singlehandedly constructed the pyramids with his powerful telekinetic abilities. His fearsome appearance would likely be depicted in countless relics, murals, statues, scrolls, and so on. In X-Men: Apocalypse, Moira MacTaggert even proposed the notion that the biblical “Four Horseman of the Apocalypse” were named after his horseman, not the other way around.
But in the X-Men universe, contemporary historians probably don’t think that En Sabah Nur was a mutant. In fact, they probably don’t believe he actually existed in real life. There would be some historians who would propose the “Maybe Apocalypse was a mutant?” theory, but these ones are outliers, most likely mocked by the scholarly community. Even in the post-Days of Future Past timeline, the general public wouldn’t have any reason to associate the big blue mutant overlord with the historical En Sabah Nur.
Lesson #2: Magneto Studies
After Apocalypse, the timeline wasn’t much influenced by mutant activity (at least, not that we know of) until the mid-20th century, when mutants began to emerge more frequently. When WWII came along, it played a key role in shaping the single most controversial mutant of the 20th century -a figure who would certainly be discussed in history classes for decades to come, and who would the singular focus of millions of magazine articles, research papers, and books.
That man, of course, is Erik Lehnsherr.
Lehnsherr’s story began when his family was murdered in the Holocaust, decades before mutant powers become public knowledge. This event scarred Lehnsherr for life, and eventually led to him becoming Magneto, who in the X-Men universe would certainly be seen by authorities and the news media in the same context as Osama Bin Laden. Unlike the universally reviled Bin Laden, however, there would probably also be studies and news analysis pieces debating whether there were merits to Lehnsherr’s argument, and whether perhapshis cause was justified, if not his methods. Some would argue that he was a terrorist, others would say he was a freedom fighter.
If there were a college course devoted to the subject of “Magneto Studies,” it would certainly begin with the Holocaust, at which point the next important point in history would be the Cuban Missile Crisis. In X-Men: First Class, the incident itself was actually manipulated into happening by Sebastian Shaw, the leader of the Hellfire Club. But the point where history started really diverging from our timeline was in that single moment where Magneto took control of all of the missiles, turned them around, and got ready to make his first massive strike on human society. Even though this bloodbath was halted, this was the first time in history where mutantkind was truly unveiled to the world’s governments, and Magneto didn’t set the best first impression.
Only one year later, Magneto was implicated in the murder of John F. Kennedy Jr., his metal-controlling powers offering the best explanation ever for the oft-disputed “magic bullet” theory. Based on Charles and Hank’s discussion of Erik’s imprisonment in Days of Future Past, it can be reasonably assumed that Erik Lehnsherr’s supposed guilt in the assassination was common knowledge, even if his mutant powers were not (yet).
Lesson #3: Anti-Mutant Prejudice Begins
Once we get to 1973, when Days of Future Past takes place, the history book gets complicated. Due to time travel interference, the entire course of history was changed. Because the new X-Men movies are taking place on the altered timeline, much of history from 1973 onward is unknown to us. For that reason, when studying a hypothetical X-Men history book, it’s necessary to continue on with the original timeline. Also, for the sake of argument, it’s conceivable that Xavier may want to teach his students about the original timeline, so that they could know what to watch out for.
In any case, 1973 is a pivotal year. In the original timeline, Mystique assassinated Trask and was captured, eventually leading to the development of Sentinels modeled after her powers. Soon after, the world truly learned about mutants, and opinions began to form. The human/mutant conflict erupted.
According to 25 Moments, a cool viral marketing website that Fox released in conjunction with Days of Future Past, by the mid-1970s Professor Charles Xavier was presenting himself before the U.S. House of Representatives, where he pleaded for basic mutant rights. In 1977, Pietro “Peter” Maximoff decided to compete in the Olympics. When Quicksilver broke eight world records, it ignited a massive controversy that resulted in a complete ban from mutants participating in sports.
In the 1980s, the televangelist Bob Bell began an organization called “The Human Majority,” which believed mutants were a curse. The Chernobyl catastrophe caused the spread of new mutant births all over Eastern Europe, included Piotr Rasputin/Colossus. Germany formally adopted anti-mutant policies, and a resulting mutant riot led to more bloodshed; in this universe, the Berlin Wall was never knocked down.
Lesson #4: The New Millennium Begins
Any study in 21st century mutant history would be closely tied in with Magneto Studies. While Charles Xavier was an equally important historical figure, his role was quieter, whereas Magneto was busy mounting violent offensives against the human race. Since the US Government had an anti-mutant agenda, it would have used Magneto’s image as a propaganda tool to fuel anti-mutant sentiment. Holding up Magneto as a symbol of mutantkind would allow politicians to pass controversial policies like the Mutant Registration Act, whereas devoting any attention to Xavier and Jean Grey’s pleas for peace could potentially lead to pro-mutant sympathy.
Thus, Magneto was the single most controversial mutant in history, and the most prominent. And his actions in the 21st century were a big reason why.
First of all, there was the Statue of Liberty incident. This didn’t claim too many lives thanks to the X-Men, but it still would have been a huge deal in the news. Keep in mind, at this point Magneto was a wanted felon – the mutant who murdered JFK. His mutant terrorist group barging into the Statue of Liberty and flashing some weird lights at the top would be scary stuff to people sitting at home. In X2: X-Men United, viewers see the near-extinction of mutants, immediately followed by Magneto causing the near-extinction of humans, but Lehnsherr’s involvement in this would not have been clear to the general public.
The miraculous thing is that after all of this went down, the United States actually started to turn around in its stance on mutants. A pro-mutant president was elected to office, and Hank McCoy was even appointed to the position of Secretary of Mutant Affairs. Things were looking up for the first time in history.
Flashforward to San Francisco, 2006, where it all came crashing back down.
When Worthington Labs announced a mutant “cure,” Magneto sprang back into action. After gathering a massive army of mutants behind him, including the Phoenix, Magneto staged his first true act of war against the human race: he tore the entire Golden Gate Bridge off of its roots, and then unleashed hundreds of bloodthirsty mutants upon the Worthington Labs facility on Alcatraz.
Consider the scale of this for a moment. Forget that the X-Men intervened to save the day, or that Wolverine stopped Jean Grey from blowing up the entire city, because the news media and general public wouldn’t know any of that stuff. What they would know is that the most wanted man on the planet had just destroyed a national landmark in the name of war — most likely killing thousands.
In the X-Men universe, this “Golden Gate Bridge Attack” would have been their 9/11. In this one action, Magneto implicated all of mutantkind as being enemies of the American people. The bomb had finally dropped.
In the X-Men universe there was never any “War on Terror,” because the “War on Mutants” took its place. Mutants were questioned, deported, subjected to police brutality, killed in hate crimes, and thrown into Guantanamo Bay. Every mutant was accused of being a secret agent for Magneto, and forced to register. And sure enough, what did all of this end up leading to?
Sentinels.
Lesson #5: The Future That Almost Was, And Then Wasn’t
Days of Future Past paints a pretty clear picture of what happened at this point. The Anti-Mutant movement reached fever pitch, mutants were thrown in concentration camps, the US government commissioned Sentinels from Trask Industries… and oops, there goes the world. After almost all of the mutants have been eliminated, the Sentinels then turned their guns on the humans.
Until the X-Men sent Wolverine back in time. The efforts of Xavier’s team saved the entirety of humanity from themselves. This would be the final history lesson for students at Xavier’s school, at which point they’d be dragged to Professor Beast’s science class so they could learn weird, confusing lessons about time travel.
However, for human students, their lessons would continue all the way to 2029, which we now know as the endpoint. By then, a new question has arisen:
Lesson #6: Where Did All the Mutants Go?
While the future world depicted in Logan isn’t so great, it’s certainly better than the post-apocalyptic scenario featured in Days of Future Past. Logan shows a country where corporate greed, genetically engineered crops, and anti-immigrant nationalism have choked the life out of the economy, easily making it the most political X-Men movie to date. While people in this society are getting by, they’re struggling, and it shows. Mutants, once poised to take over the human race, have mostly died out, and no new mutants are being born, thanks to Zander Rice’s high fructose corn syrup.
But what’s most significant here, as far as the history of the X-Men, is that at this point the context in which mutants are viewed has entirely changed. Now that they’re no longer a “threat” for human survival, people have become nostalgic about mutants, and celebrate their past achievements, or are excited when they run into one of them. The X-Men have become iconic heroes of the past, pop culture icons whose past heroism is never questioned. Comic books are made of them. Parents probably brag to their kids about the time “the X-Men saved me.”
Strange as this might seem, it’s actually quite realistic. Real life heroes and social movements are often controversial in their time — but in later decades, these figures become celebrated as icons. It makes sense that in this universe the X-Men would be treated the same way. Even though the mutant gene was suppressed, and even though the X-Men never lived to see themselves accepted, their legacy will live on… and in the history books, they will be forever memorialized as the heroes that they really were.
Until the next timeline change, that is.
Skull Island: King Kong’s Backstory Explained
The new King Kong film, Kong: Skull Island, effectively recontextualizes the story of the mighty gorilla. Instead of merely remaking the primal fairy-tale once again, Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ version reworks the tale of the giant primate into something fresh. Almost the entire movie takes place on the titular island, with the story following a group of explorers trying to survive the strange prehistoric creatures that live there and get to the other side for rescue. This quest is hampered by the maniacal Col. Packard (Samuel L. Jackson), who develops a grudge match with Kong after several of his men are killed in the first encounter with the primal beast. Unlike the original, capturing this jungle ruler isn’t an option and the movie goes the long way around when it comes to explaining why.
Part of the new MonsterVerse that launched with 2014’s Godzilla, Kong: Skull Island introduces the King to the fold with a new backstory that mixes some classic elements with new mythology, in order to set the universe up for the long-haul. The crux of this is the hollow earth theory, which theorizes a whole other world is lurking below the planet’s surface. Bill Randa (John Goodman) is a scientist who, along with the organization Monarch, has become obsessed with the idea that the world once belonged to giant monsters, and some of those monsters are still around. Randa is convinced that one such creature attacked a boat he was serving on in the navy and left him as the only survivor, and he’s dedicated his life to proving it.
Randa’s search leads him to Skull Island, a previously completely uncharted region of the South Pacific ocean. Randa and his assistant, seismologist Heuston Brooks (Corey Hawkins), believe Skull Island to be an entry point through which the entities that live under the earth’s crust can come up, and after some last-ditch scientific funding and the enlisting of a military escort, they embark to explore it. To get seismic data as quick as possible, they drop bombs on the island’s surface when they first arrive to get a read on whether the earth below is hollow.
Their hypothesis is proven correct but quickly draws the attention of Kong – which was the real motive behind the bombing of the island. The giant gorilla makes swift work of the helicopters that the scientists and their escort arrive in. Once they’re stranded in various parts of the isle, the scientific team and the soldiers work their way around the forests and jungles, encountering giant spiders, pterodactyl-like birds and massive water beasts – seeing first-hand the kind of life that exists around a hollow earth waypoint.
No other monsters are mentioned specifically until the post-credits sequence, but the overt implication is that all the monsters of the MonsterVerse will come from places like Skull Island – mysterious pieces of land where the ground is thin enough for these possibly prehistoric beings to break through. Godzilla hinted at a similar story, though kept it contextual to Godzilla as a “great equalizer” that was there to keep us in check, riffing on the lizard being an embodiment of nuclear paranoia. Monarch is the same company seen in Godzilla, and some of the same language is employed in Kong: Skull Island – specifically, the idea that we share the planet with ferocious entities beyond ourselves.
King Kong’s cinematic history began in 1933, and the giant ape has been portrayed in many different movies over the years (some good, most pretty bad). Initially Kong is painted as the brute Godlike animal with allegiance to no other living creature, but gradually he’s revealed to be the protector and lode-bearer of the island’s eco-system. Mason Weaver (Brie Larson) and James Conrad (Tom Hiddleston) find a completely isolated tribe of indigenous people, with whom John C. Reilly’s Hank Marlow has lived for years after his plane crashed. As with previous iterations the tribe still regard King Kong as sacred, but here it’s retooled as respect for their eco-system and its balance, rather than as a violent or sacrificial religion. The tribe are shown to be completelu pacifist and in harmony, having built a wall to keep out anything that Kong himself hasn’t killed that would try to to hurt them.
The main threat to this tribe – and, indeed, to anyone else unfortunate enough to land on Skull Island – is a race of monsters dubbed “Skull Crawlers” by Marlow, who play an important role in the rebooted Kong’s backstory. Both of the Kong’s parents died keeping bigger Skull Crawlers at bay, leaving him the only one who can stop them – and even then, only by killing them while they’re still young and weak.
The movie also takes care to establish another key fact about Kong: that he is relatively young, and is still growing. This is important because Kong will eventually face off against Godzilla, whose current incarnation is around 350ft tall, and could therefore crush classic portrayals of King Kong under one foot. Since Kong: Skull Island is set in the 1970s, and Godzilla was set in the modern day, the already massive Kong can spend several more decades growing before he has to fight the King of Monsters.
One important questions remains: the question of why Kong and Godzilla will end up fighting, since both creatures are portrayed as being fairly benevolent – a balancing force against monsters like the M.U.T.O.s and the Skull Crawlers. Beyond his initial (arguably justified) rampage against Packard’s men, Kong appears to be relatively docile, submitting to Weaver’s touch and even protecting her from the adult Skull Crawler towards the end.
In one of the movie’s most striking images, Kong allows the surviving characters to fly away, watching and roaring as they leave. He has a purpose to continue to serve on the island as its great guardian, saving it from whatever other oddities happen to emerge from the ground. But while the island’s visitors may have pledged to keep it a secret, it seems unlikely that Skull Island will remain undisturbed by the outside world for much longer.
Netflix Hires Producer to Oversee Original Movies Business
Streaming giant Netflix continues to expand, and not just with its many award-winning original TV series. The company has reportedly been looking into increasing the production of their own original content. This means more original series, but it also means more focus on improving their feature-length offerings. Movies are an area where Netflix hasn’t been performing as well as they could be, with plenty of films having been released, but none that have reached the level of critical acclaim or fan excitement seen with the company’s television series.
Earlier this month, it was reported that Netflix was looking to hire a producer to head up their film division and bring it up to scratch — and now we can confirm that the company has found the man for the job.
Today, THR confirmed that Scott Stuber has been hired as the new head of Netflix’s film division, and will be ‘leading future development, production and acquisition’ for Netflix’s feature-length content. Stuber spoke about his new role in the company, saying:
“Netflix is at the forefront in changing the way entertainment is enjoyed throughout the world, bringing a greater variety of stories to more people than ever before. It’s an incredible opportunity to work with a company with such reach and that stands for such diverse quality content for global audiences.”
Stuber is known for his work on Patriot’s Day, Ted, A Million Ways To Die In The West, Love And Other Drugs, and many more. He is described by Netflix head Ted Sarandos as “well known and respected in the film industry. His innovative work and strong talent relationships should help accelerate the Netflix original film initiative,” and was previously being courted by Paramount to head up their film division.
This is big news for Netflix’s film division, as it points toward an emphasis on even more original content coming soon. The streaming site has already got several big titles in the works, including the live-action anime adaptation Death Note, Martin Scorsese’s highly anticipated gangster movie The Irishman, and Will Smith’s latest project, Bright. Orson Welles’s final film will also be released on Netflix. The addition of Stuber to the team promises even more exciting new creations and acquisitions for the company.
However, some may be concerned that Netflix’s move toward even more original content could impact its future as a streaming service for content created elsewhere. Should Netflix become it’s own ‘network’ of sorts, we may be left looking for somewhere else to watch all of our other favorite shows. This is unlikely to be an issue any time soon, of course, but it is worth keeping an eye on as the site continues to grow and shift focus.
Is Marvel Done With Standalone Superhero Movies?
Once upon a time, when Marvel Studios was tentatively releasing the first Iron Man movie and the Edward Norton-led The Incredible Hulk, the Marvel Cinematic Universe was little more than a twinkle in Kevin Feige’s eye and not even the most optimistic comic book fan could’ve ever imagined the critically acclaimed box-office juggernaut the MCU has now become. Those early movies were largely standalone features, with only a smattering of Easter Eggs and post-credit scenes to connect them to the wider Marvel world and hint at the multi-hero universe that was soon to come into full effect.
That all changed with Joss Whedon’s The Avengers in 2012. Combining the efforts of Marvel Studios’ previous standalone movies and bringing together an A-List ensemble cast, The Avengers changed the landscape of the superhero genre and showed exactly the level of critical and commercial success that could be achieved in a multi-hero venture. From this point on, characters began to cross over with far more frequency – notably Black Window landing a significant role in Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Cap’s own cameo in Thor: The Dark World – and this phenomenon was pushed to the next level with Captain America: Civil War. Despite technically being the third Captain America solo movie, Civil War felt, looked and acted far more like an Avengers film, featuring the majority of the MCU in a huge cinematic dust up.
By achieving more success than either of the previous two Cap movies could manage, Civil War proved that expanding the franchise’s universe with multiple superheroes and interconnected plots in turn brought greater rewards. Since then, it has seemed as if Marvel’s standalone movie days might just be numbered, as Robert Downey Jr. prepares to appear in Spider-Man: Homecoming, Bruce Banner gets a big part in Thor: Ragnarok and half of Hollywood joins the cast list of The Avengers: Infinity War. But with Marvel Studios preparing to introduce a new batch of characters for Phase Three, is it really going to abandon its standalone movies?
Standalone Success
Having constructed their cinematic empire from the ground up over a number of years, Marvel Studios clearly appreciates the importance of taking the time to build characters and familiarize audiences with them via individual standalone movies. Captain America: The First Avenger and Thor might not be the most fondly remembered entries in the MCU but both were critical in the establishment of their respective characters and as a result, when The Avengers rolled around, fans were already very comfortable with each figure’s personalities, motivations and backstories, allowing Joss Whedon to focus on more interesting topics without having to worry about the grunt work.
For the sake of comparison, Warner Bros.’ D.C. Extended Universe has taken a different approach, quickly launching into the Batman V. Superman team-up movie that connected significantly to the franchise’s larger narrative. The DCEU hasn’t had as easy a time as its Marvel counterpart when it comes to critical reception and part of the reason for this can be attributed to the decision to pull the trigger on the wider reaching movies before building the franchise up with some standalone features beforehand.
With the MCU set to introduce new protagonists such as Captain Marvel and ramp up the roles of newer figures like Black Panther, the importance of standalone movies will once again become apparent, especially since these characters’ comic origins aren’t as well known within a mainstream audience. This has already been seen in Marvel’s most recent venture – Doctor Strange. Other than a hilarious post-credits cameo and some brief visual or dialogue references to the wider MCU, Doctor Strange represented a move back towards the franchise’s past of self-contained stories by focusing squarely on the characters at hand.
This move was entirely necessary as not only is Doctor Strange a lesser known character in the Marvel canon but he heralds a whole new world of magic and mysticism that required a standalone movie to properly introduce, explain and do justice to. Happily, the movie was a resounding success both in terms of box office takings and reviews, which aimed particular praise at the visual style and the execution of this new mystic side to the MCU.
Another property that has been more or less standalone in nature is Guardians of the Galaxy. Although the first movie featured Thanos – arch-villain of the MCU’s overall narrative – the intergalactic location set the movie apart from the rest of the Marvel world and was another example of a mega-successful standalone piece. Somewhat surprisingly, it appears from the trailers and plot details released so far that Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 will be even more self-contained than the original movie and although you can expect some form of set-up to lead the characters towards Infinity War, the sequel has its own ensemble, stories and lore to play with without throwing other MCU characters or plot lines into the mix and yet despite this, GOTG remains an integral part of the franchise.
A Future United
Certainly then, standalone movies will be a key part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe – at least in the immediate future – but it could be argued that the studio are reserving these for lesser known characters that casual fans may need familiarizing with. The idea of a solo movie starring Steve Rogers or Thor that doesn’t have implications in the wider MCU seems unlikely at this point, as the various Avengers have become ever more entangled in each others’ character arcs. Furthermore, given the impact of Civil War, if Marvel Studios hypothetically did decide to announce Captain America 4 as a standalone solo movie with no additional characters, there would no doubt be some sections of the fandom who would be disappointed at what could be seen as a ‘smaller’ scale film. Marvel set its own bar and now it has the responsibility of meeting those expectations.
The same can be said for the Thor series. Neither of the Norse God’s solo adventures were rapturously received but the hype surrounding the forthcoming Ragnarok is palpable and that’s largely thanks to the addition of Bruce Banner. In what is being described as a ‘buddy picture‘ in space’, there is considerably more anticipation for this third trip to Asgard and when all is said and done, money talks. If Ragnarok vastly out-performs the previous two Thor movies – and it most likely will – then the formula will surely be clear for Marvel to follow: more characters and interconnected stories = higher box office.
And from a critical standpoint, it would be difficult to blame them. After all, the core Avengers characters have all had their groundwork laid – Hawkeye and Black Widow aside – and audiences are very familiar with each of them at this point. It not only makes good business sense to have these characters team up with others and become involved in story lines that develop over a number of films, it also keeps them fresh and relevant in an ever-expanding movie universe and the standalone features can be reserved for newer characters. As far as Spider-Man: Homecoming is concerned, Peter Parker might be new to the MCU but Marvel Studios will only be too aware of how familiar movie-goers are with the character and bringing in Tony Stark will greatly aid in anchoring Spidey to the wider Marvel universe after five movies under the Sony umbrella.
However, the real acid test for Marvel’s intentions with their standalone output will be next year’s Ant-Man and the Wasp. Aside from a brief scrap with Anthony Mackie’s Falcon, the first Ant-Man movie was a standalone heist movie, largely unconnected to the rest of the franchise. Now that the character has properly established himself, it’ll be interesting to see whether the same approach will be utilized for the sequel or whether Ant-Man’s new Avengers connections will mean a more involved role in the wider goings-on of the MCU and feature appearances from more names than just Falcon. If Marvel goes with the latter, it’ll be a strong sign that the studio is looking to make their movies as inter-connected as possible, reserving standalone features for newer characters in need of exposition and establishment.
After Infinity
If it feels as if the Marvel Cinematic Universe is putting less emphasis on standalone movies, this can perhaps be explained by the relative proximity of The Avengers: Infinity War. The forthcoming battle against Thanos represents the culmination of a decade of movies and is the very moment the MCU has been building towards since its inception. With plenty to do before reaching that point, it’s only natural that the focus right now would be on the bigger picture. But what happens when the threat of Thanos has been vanquished?
There’s only so ‘big’ Marvel can realistically go in terms of scale and – judging from the cast list and rumored budget – the conclusion of the Thanos arc will be bigger than anything seen before. From there, attempting to go even bigger doesn’t feel like the most appropriate option. The Michael Bay philosophy of ‘more, more, more’ is unlikely to cut it in the MCU and although there are plenty of juicy, universe-spanning stories from the comics to pick from, it may not be wise to jump straight from the Thanos material into a new major arc right away.
Perhaps then, the post-Infinity War MCU may see a return to prominence of the standalone superhero movie. After all, if you can’t go bigger, the only way is inwards and this might see whichever Marvel characters are left standing get involved in some more personal, small-scale stories. For instance, it has long been rumored that Sebastian Stan’s Winter Soldier would eventually take over the Captain America mantle from Steve Rogers. There have also been rumblings of a solo outing for Black Widow and for Mark Ruffalo to get the opportunity to finally do a standalone Hulk movie justice. In the wake of Thanos, perhaps these stories and other standalone fare can once again come to the fore… and start building towards a whole new major arc.
Wonder Woman Origin Trailer: Breakdown & Analysis
WARNING: This article contains potential SPOILERS for Wonder Woman
–
Batman and Superman may tease their audience with secrecy, but Wonder Woman more than delivers when a brand new trailer is expected to drop. Not long after Warner Bros. and director Patty Jenkins took press behind the scenes to see for themselves how Wonder Woman compares to the DCEU so far, those excited for the movie now have a new preview to enjoy. And enjoy it they will, since it dives into the DC history of Themyscira, Diana’s Amazon training, the villainous Ares she’ll be fighting, her mythical weaponry, her superpowers, and yes, more enemy soldiers being punched than you could ever demand.
Of course, the new Wonder Woman ‘Origin’ trailer only reveals significant insights into those facets of the film if you’re looking closely. Thankfully, we make a habit of doing just that. The new trailer reveals far more about the story, the action, the larger mythology, and how Patty Jenkins is making her mark than you might think. It demands a bit of analysis and reading between the lines, but we’re breaking it all down so fans won’t miss out on a single detail.
Needless to say, there will be SPOILERS in our look at the Wonder Woman Origin Trailer: Breakdown & Analysis.
20. Behold The Gods’ Gift
The trailer opens with more insanely picturesque shots of Themyscira, Diana’s hidden home, but focuses in on an image torn right out of a Disney tale of mothers and daughters: Queen Hippolyta (Connie Nielsen) standing, arms outstretched, presenting the world itself to her young daughter as a “gift from the gods.” The landscape lives up to that claim, but it’s a literal statement in this case, since the mythology of the DCEU’s Themyscira states that the island truly was a gift from Zeus himself – but more on that later.
The architecture no longer surprises, since its mix of Greek and Roman stonework embedded and scattered across the rocky terrain has been glimpsed before. The context or significance behind these select busts can’t yet be known, but we would point out the wildlife as evidence of how deep the idea of a world ‘without men’ goes. Those birds look to be leucistic or albino peacocks: male members of the peahen species with longer tails, typically using their extravagant coloring to attract a mate.
It appears that on Themyscira men are still relevant to reproduction, in the animal world at least. But the idea that males ‘court’ women may be completely done away with, judging by these regal, but guileless fowl.
19. The Art Tells a Story
Getting back to that idea of Themyscira being just one of several literal gifts from the gods, the trailer immediately shifts to Hippolyta and Diana making their way along a decorated stone wall, with the Queen explaining that the other gifts will one day be known to Diana… and this is where they keep them. If the structure beside them is the holding place for those gifts – which seems to be the case – then it’s likely the building is the massive Armory, visible as the thick, stout tower dominating the Themysciran landscape. But what’s outside may be just as relevant to fans.
During our visit to the Wonder Woman editing bay, we were told of the Themysciran origins, as they are explained to Diana in the film. In an animated sequence Queen Hippolyta informs her daughter of the betrayal of Ares, who turned man into angry, war-hungry armies eager to tear Zeus and his creation apart. Zeus created the Amazons to protect the world from Ares’s treachery, kicking off a war among the gods. Ares won, but before Zeus died he created Themyscira for his Amazons, and left them the weapons we’ll soon see introduced.
Take a closer look at those reliefs the pair is riding past, and they look to be (from left to right): a man pressing a raised forearm to someone possessing a not-quite-human profile (helmeted, perhaps?), the face of Zeus surrounded by what could be lightning bolts, and what looks like a crowd of women raising their interlocked arms towards… something. Are we seeing that origin story told in three pictures? We’ll have to wait until the film for a final word, but we’re open to other theories.
18. Young Diana Learns Her History
As we learned during said visit to the editing bay, the film fills in the audience on the pertinent plot information alongside Diana, being welcomed into the larger Amazon culture at the age of eight. Here we see the form that takes, with the origin of their people explained, and the most powerful tool bequeathed to them by Zeus… a tool so powerful, Diana will never be the one to wield it. After all, she is not destined for ferocity, but finery, as the daughter and future Queen of the Amazons. It’s unclear just how long ago this scene takes place (Amazons being immortal and all), but the image of a young Diana is significant to the overall DCEU.
The Justice League debuted in Batman V Superman with the spotlight placed on Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. And with this trailer, it seems that all of DC’s ‘Big Three’ will be introduced as children, in the context of scenes encapsulating their adult journeys and conflicts. In Man of Steel, it was Clark’s struggle to control his alien powers, but his human mother somehow able to help him anyway (a microcosm of the character’s dual identity as empowering, not limiting). In BvS, Bruce saw his father fight back against crime, and get everyone he loved killed (his total blindness to the fact that he walked the same line defining his obliviousness).
Now with Wonder Woman, Diana will be presented with the very heights of Amazonian tradition and exceptionalism, and told it is not the destiny chosen for her. It lights a fire of defiance and self-realization, but based in service to her people and excellence, not a rebellious impulse.
17. The Godkiller
Finally, the trailer offers the best look yet at the Godkiller, the sword left behind as a gift from Zeus. Since the father of the Greek gods could not know that his chosen Amazons would be safe from Ares forever, he left them a weapon capable of killing him. Unfortunately, it sounds as though the weapon itself is beyond the character of any but the fiercest Amazon (we’re putting out money on Antiope). Not to mention that it should only be used to kill Ares, so if you have to use it, things have already gotten worse than most Amazons would want to consider.
Unfortunately, it’s hard to offer any lengthy insight into the Godkiller, since it seems a wholly original creation for the film and plot. In DC Comics, Wonder Woman’s sword isn’t usually given a unique or mythical history, and while a sword called Godkiller does exist in the DCU, it’s certainly not this one. But Hippolyta’s explicit claim that “only the fiercest among us even could” wield the sword begs a bit more investigation. How does she mean it? Is it a weapon similar to Thor’s Mjolnir, able to be wielded only by the one deemed worthy? Or does its god-killing ability demand power from the wielder directly?
Keep in mind the idea that Zeus may have left his chosen people – led by his chosen woman – a sword that most could never wield, but is the weapon needed to defend them, inevitably, from his cruel son. It may all make sense in the end.
16. Diana Has An Audience
The fight scenes that follow fly past in an instant, especially considering they’re all headed to the most memorable use of Diana’s powers we’ve yet seen teased for the film. But going piece by piece, there are elements of the plot, and character work on Diana and her fellow Amazons to be absorbed. For starters, the image of a teenage Diana being trained by General Antiope (Robin Wright) might seem to stand at odds with Queen Hippolyta’s idea for Diana’s future. And it should, since Diana seeks out her weapons training specifically against her mother’s wishes. Antiope agrees to train her until she is discovered at age 15, when she first exhibits her soon-to-be-seen powers… at which point Hippolyta requests formal training.
It’s that formal training that follows, with Diana well into adulthood and taking on all challengers. Amazons practicing combat may seem commonplace, but the gallery of woman standing and spectating as Diana goes through her routine speaks volumes. In the comics, just like the film, Diana is exceptional – and her sisters know it. They’re good, but she’s better. They’re loving, but she embodies compassion. They’re beautiful, but she’s… well, popular. And when she unsheaths her sword, looses her arrows, and evades attacks from all sides, the people gather to witness it. Thankfully, she has Antiope to keep her grounded.
15. Diana’s Magic Vambraces… Not So Magic?
If you asked the average DC Comics fan about the significance or power of Wonder Woman’s bulletproof bracers (or vambraces), they’ll probably give a simple answer: they’re strong enough to deflect bullets. Amazons are tough and strong, but bullets can be tricky. But Zack Snyder seems to have introduced a new bit of mythology surrounding those vambraces that Patty Jenkins is either continuing, or evolving into her own story. In Batman V Superman, they could be crossed to protect her and Batman from Kryptonian heat vision. And when smashed together, created a powerful energy blast of her own.
At the time, it was taken as a classic case of enchanted armor, courtesy of the gods. Stronger than anything, and able to channel that energy into offense. But take a close look at Diana’s vambraces right before the moment that Antiope brings down her sword. They’re actually glowing in anticipation of the coming attack… which calls into question both of those previous assumptions. For one, their mystical powers aren’t tied to actually even being struck by an attack. And they’re not transferring that energy out at all… but they’re doing something new, at least as far as comic fans are concerned. And we’ve got a theory.
14. Diana Discovers Her Power
As we mentioned before, Diana’s secret combat training only came to an end when something, someone, or some event triggered her ability to generate energy blasts. At that point, Hippolyta realized she was gifted in a way her sisters were not… and she entered into combat training, with those signature vambraces strapped to her forearms. Now when pushed to the breaking point by Antiope in a moment of instructive rage, Diana is bested, driven back, and forced to emit a strong enough blast of energy to take her opponent – and everyone around them – off of their feet. And nobody seems more surprised than her.
The simplest conclusion is that Diana’s vambraces aren’t doing anything but possibly helping her control the energy coming from her directly. Since this example is actually a combination of defense and offense, Batman V Superman fans can debate just how she manipulated her gift to both separately opposite Doomsday. There is some comic book source material exploring the idea that Diana’s bracers are actually designed to control her demigod powers, which may be more relevant here than some expected. Especially if Hippolyta only enrolled her in training once she learned what Diana may have inherited from, say, her father?
13. A Queendom of Isolation
Aside from a stunning ocean horizon, this shot drives home the idea of just how isolated Themyscira is intended to look, seem, and feel to both inhabitants and the audience. It could be more difficult to convince young audience members that Diana and the Amazons could truly exist completely unseen, or completely oblivious to the outside world. But when you’re surrounded by waters like these in every direction – and whether you’re aware there’s an enchantment at work or not – it’s a bit more believable.
That enchantment is a literal one, and has been used to keep outsiders from laying their eyes on Themyscira in just about every version of the island. When Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) and Diana eventually leave to return him to Europe, they do so in a boat that actually crosses through the barrier concealing the island. It’s an effect we’ll try to keep unspoiled for fans, but if nothing else, seeing this landscape every day makes the sudden arrival of a World War I pilot feel as shocking as it should.
12. Updates To Themyscira’s Throne Room
With the finished effects on this location, it’s abundantly clear that this is the throne room of Themyscira. Previous shots used in trailers had been unfinished, leaving the foreground empty and the background filler landscape. Now, with the rocky outcroppings of the island’s heart visible on the right side, and the rows upon rows of chairs filling the foreground, the room’s function as a gathering place for the Amazons. Hopefully these chairs will be filled in the film to get a sense of the actual scale of the Amazon society, but we’ll just keep our fingers crossed.
As an extra hat tip to the production team under Patty Jenkins, applause is due to their ability to craft a royal throne that is as un-phallic as possible. Instead, Hippolyta sits in her seat of power flanked by two perfect circles (the anti-phallus). We would assume one is reserved for Diana, since she stands at her mother’s side in most of the Queen’s appearances, but the other is unknown (Antiope, perhaps?). The Queen’s throne? Another circle, but spiraling inward to emphasize her unending rule. Needless to say, Steve Trevor’s stunned reactions are justified.
11. Role Reversal
As thrilling as it is to see that Chris Pine remains in anachronistically-fit shape as Steve Trevor, the lack of dialogue in this scene is both disappointing and exciting. After all, given Diana’s dress, it would seem that she is only now getting the chance to address the strange man who washed up on the shores of her home. She has yet to even have her wounds dressed, so the healing factor and medicine of Themyscira remains hard to pin down (unless – gasp – she’s already been healed?). But for every fan of Diana Prince, this first exchange is the one to watch out for.
It seems to fall to Diana to give Steve what little information he is allowed to absorb about this strange place, and her own role of authority within it. It’s the kind of subversion of power dynamics that Pine proved particularly good at in the Star Trek series, so we doubt he’ll let fans of Steve Trevor down. The version of Steve and Diana’s first meeting was given a further inversion of the traditional story – Steve an emotional wreck, Diana the rock of support – but it looks like some humor may be more likely in the film version.
10. Setting The Board For The Battle
There’s nothing exceptionally groundbreaking here, just one more shot of the epic cavalry charge of the Amazons, led by Antiope, preparing to stun some German soldiers out of their boots. Previous trailers showed the ensuing scene, and the moments of German assault that precede it (in which Diana and Steve are defended by descending Amazons, and Diana gets her first look at the tiny, fast-moving projectiles we regular folk call “bullets.” Diana and Steve are presumed to be taking cover on the right side of this image, as the army arrives to distract and destroy.
It’s a moment for military buffs and historical warfare enthusiasts to discuss, as Antiope has clearly divided her forces to make the most concise victory attainable. Select soldiers rappel down the cliffs to personally act as a shield for their princess, while the brunt of the cavalry makes their assault in a straight line along the beach. For the newcomers, this would be called a ‘flying wedge’ formation: an attack intended to maximize the power of the impact as opposed to approaching in a straight line. Fortunately, the Germans might not have to take the hit at full force.
9. General Antiope’s Triple (Yes, Triple) Arrow
Now seems as fitting a time as any to call out Robin Wright’s appearance in the trailer, charged with playing the fiercest of the Amazon’s military structure, General Antiope (we’re still not sure how that one’s going to be pronounced on film). In a typical comic book story, there may be reason to suspect that the most trusted, and deadliest lieutenant is actually the most likely to turn against the ruler, but we doubt that twist will play out here. After all, Queen Hippolyta is a traditionally smart, shrewd, and powerful ruler. And Antiope is her closest sister.
The movie has yet to be released, and audiences have already gotten to see multiple reasons why Wright’s Antiope could be the fan-favorite Amazon of the lot. First came her leaping arrow fire, then stabbing an opponent soldier with a bundle of arrows. In this trailer she proves just as deadly with a sword, and in this slow motion shot, it’s revealed she’s actually firing three arrows back at her target. Let’s just say that if the unthinkable happens an Antiope does decide to follow her own mission… we feel sorry for the Amazons who oppose her.
8. Ludendorff’s Private War
We’ve extensively covered the villain of Wonder Woman played by actor Danny Huston, which wasn’t easy considering how closely the secret of his identity was held by the filmmakers. We now know that this direct antagonist of Wonder Woman will be Erich Ludendorff, a very real, historical member of the German high command, controlling all German war operations alongside Hindenburg. We speculated that Ludendorff being a real person, whose military career extended (less than glamorously) after the war meant he likely isn’t Ares in this story… but that doesn’t mean he’s not evil.
We’re referring to this fictional Ludendorff, not the real one. His connection with ‘Doctor Poison,’ the masked woman concocting his chemical weapons seems a simple one, but this shot demonstrates just how determined he is to keep the war going forward. At this point in the story, the Germans and Allies are actually trying to reach an armistice. But judging by the level of activity Ludendorff has arrived to confirm, he’s a long way away from giving up the fight. This could be the location Steve Trevor infiltrates personally, before being shot down over Themyscira.
7. Diana Answering The Call
The dialogue leading up to Diana’s decision to leave home seems to be comprised of a few different scenes or contexts, which may be for the best. The final exchange between Queen Hippolyta and her daughter should be a heartbreaking and meaningful one, so the less revealed in trailers the better. Since Diana makes it clear to her mother that she’s not going to pass up the chance to return Steve to the war, track down Ares driving the events in secret, and kill him, we can only assume she has a blessing to retrieve the Godkiller (and the armor and golden lassoo).
In literary terms, Diana seems to be sticking quite close to the Hero’s Journey. Steve Trevor’s surprise entry into Themyscira telling tales of a global war beyond their doorstep shatters her notion of the mundane world she inhabits. By teasing a villain who may be the one her people were always destined to vanquish, Diana hears her call to adventure, and being the Queen’s daughter, can’t resist the call. Hippolyta is apparently an English literature major, since she seems to realize that refusing the call is simply not an option (not when Diana has a Justice League to help build).
6. Reading The Godkiller
As Diana takes the Godkiller, the audience is given its best look at the hilt and blade of the divine weapon. There’s plenty to talk about, too – unfortunately, the inscription on the blade is a mystery, since those symbols haven’t been matched to any language or alphabet we can recognize. The sword wielded by Diana in Batman V Superman – referred to as the Sword of Athena – had an inscription pulled from a Joseph Campbell quote, but it neither looks nor reads like this solo film weapon.
What may be the most curious detail is the hilt constructed out of two dragons sharing a neck and sinking their teeth into the blade. As even casual fans may know, dragons don’t play a massive role in Greek mythology, with those present presumed to have been adopted as part of a Near East cultural tradition. Still, if these dragons are of any particular significance, be it historic or fictional, there are a few choices. They could represent Cadmus and his wife, the hero who slew Ares’s son, the great Ismenian dragon or serpent. Or they could be the heads of the Lernaean Hydra, hinting that a beast or creature’s poison could be what defines this blade as a “god killer.” Your guess is as good as ours!
5. Diana Arrives in London
As we mentioned before, we know that Steve and Diana leave the island of Themyscira in a boat, and the style and decoration of this vessel matches what most would expect. The earlier shot of London’s smoke-filled skies actually reveals this boat being pulled up the Thames by a smoke-spewing tugboat, which may explain why Diana seems more than a little uneasy. That, and she finds this city absolutely hideous (at that time in history, she wasn’t wrong, either).
For those curious to see how the comic book mythology of Themyscira is being adopted or changed for film, we can confirm that when the boat leaves Diana’s home, she and Steve witness their piercing of the veil surrounding the island. The mystical barrier that keeps the island hidden is pushed through, surrounding them, than snapping back into place. That adds some context before Diana heads to a city that’s never even thought to look for her… but also hints that getting home may not be a possibility.
4. Diana Doesn’t Need a Sword
There’s no way to get past it: the hours, days, weeks, and months following Gal Gadot’s casting as Wonder Woman were filled with criticism and doubt that those responsible may wish left in the past. Much of the controversy surrounded Gadot’s body – with accusations she was “too skinny” taken with a laugh by Gadot herself – and as keen as we are on not restarting that conversation, it’s clear that Gadot has risen to the same bar of dedication and physical performance of her co-stars, heaving a tank in a display of her Teres Majors alone that would leave grown men green with envy.
Jokes aside, this scene reveals that Diana’s physical strength isn’t just tied to her invulnerability or weapon skills. If her sword and shield are lost, or a massive metal vehicle is simply the best tool for the job, then she’s not above grabbing hold and sending it flying through the air towards an enemy encampment. Or, in this case, into the side of a building in a German-controlled French village. We just hope that she’s able to test her limits on more than inanimate objects before the end of the film.
3. Ludendorff Learns Who He’s Fighting
If we’re sticking to our theory that it’s actually a peace-seeking military man who is playing Ares in disguise, and not the obvious choice of Ludendorff, then the footage of him being kicked by Diana, or flung through the air with her lasso need some explanation. At least, we think they do, since Wonder woman doesn’t seem like the kind of person to brutalize an aging officer. We caught a glimpse of Ludendorff inhaling a strange, life-restoring chemical during our 16-minute preview of Wonder Woman, which could explain the enhanced, window-shattering strength and durability (while still fitting our theory, if those chemicals originated with Ares to help keep Diana distracted).
It’s assumed that Diana is delivering her explanation of her name, her origins, and her lineage to Ludendorff, still under the assumption that he is Ares. We can’t say for certain, but thankfully, we now know how the DCEU will be pronouncing “Hippolyta.” So say it with us, DCEU fans: “Hih-PAUL-ittuh.”
2. Patty Jenkins is Pushing The Envelope
It’s tempting to look past the moments of stylized action or shot compositions to glean plot-specific details, or clues as to what’s coming next in DC’s movie universe. But doing that risks missing the incredibly promising, energetic, and Snyder-esque beats being constructed by Patty Jenkins. His name may be a trigger for trolls or passionate fans, but WB had a good reason to entrust the Justice League, Superman, and Batman to Zack Snyder: in short, for reinventing the way that action look in modern blockbusters. That’s a hard act to follow – and one that the Suicide Squad never attempted, nor succeeded in topping.
Jenkins, on the other hand, has offered up close to a dozen memorable, gif-worthy shots from these trailers alone. With Diana sliding across rooms on her shield, smashing through panes of glass, leaping over fences from horseback, and now, following a German soldier out a window in a slow-mo, side-on panning shot… who knows how much we have to look forward to? Either way, repeat viewings could be a must if the 300 energy is this strong throughout all of Jenkins and Gadot’s action scenes.
1. The Truth of Diana’s Superpower?
Finally, we arrive at what could be the most telling image of the trailer, in terms of its impact on theories concerning Diana’s powers, the origin of the Amazons, and her true parentage. In the previous trailer, the moment in which Diana’s crossed vambraces seem to be absorbing electrical energy was used to punctuate its action crescendo. This time around, the entire shot is shown, beginning with Diana hovering in the air, arms spread, and slowly drawing her forearms together in front of her. But before she does, her armor takes on a life of its own.
Her vambraces glowing as energy is discharged is one thing. But her entire armor glowing as she seems to prepare for a larger, more powerful attack – potentially fuelled by ‘lightning’ – speaks to something more than just enchanted weaponry, or a means to control energy. If the theory that this version of Wonder Woman is actually the daughter of Hippolyta and Zeus proves true, then this all makes sense. Hippolyta set Diana on a path to becoming the Amazons’ champion once she learned she had inherited godlike powers from Zeus, kept it a secret, and kept Diana from pursuing the role so she could do it herself.
If true, then coming face to face with Ares or his underling could raise questions of just what Wonder Woman is. And if revealed to her, then Diana could accept that fact, becoming more powerful and willing to channel all her power through her body (and armor) into a new direction. Before, you know… failing to actually stop World War I or the century of warfare that followed. But even the daughter of Zeus can’t win ’em all.
–
That’s every meaningful plot beat, possible reveal or missing link we managed to spot in the ‘Origin’ trailer for Wonder Woman, but there are plenty more twists or potential reveals to discuss among the fans. We invite every reader to share your favorite moments, your best theories, or the lingering questions in the comments.
Wonder Woman Director Confirms Boxer Ann Wolfe is Artemis
Director Patty Jenkins’ Wonder Woman solo movie is a standalone adventure for Gal Gadot’s Diana Prince – one that goes back in time in the DC Extended Universe, to explore Diana’s experiences during World War 1. The trailer footage for Wonder Woman released so far has combined more fantastical elements with historical set pieces ands settings, suggesting that as far as the aesthetic of Jenkins’ movie goes, Wonder Woman is a far cry from Batman V Superman; the film in which Gadot made her screen debut as the iconic Amazonian warrior.
The final Wonder Woman trailer landed recently, highlighting more of Diana’s mystical background on her home island of Themyscira. This sets the stage for the appearance of more mythical figures in Jenkins’ film, chief among being the villainous Ares, God of War. Of course, Ares is not the only member of the Greek pantheon to be joining the DCEU during Wonder Woman
Jenkins took to Twitter to confirm the identity of one particular Wonder Woman supporting cast member: American boxer Ann Wolfe. It turns out Wolfe is costarring in the film as Artemis, crossbow-wielding ally of Diana, as the following Tweet from Jenkins confirms:
Wolfe’s Wonder Woman role was first teased back in April of 2016, via a photo that showed her with Gadot and Connie Nelson, the latter of whom plays Diana’s mother in the movie. The retired boxer’s role has been unconfirmed until now, but casting the multi-title winning athlete in this fearsome role could be a masterstroke. Wolfe transitioning from fighter to actor moves her into an increasingly-expanding bracket of fighters-turned actors; one that also includes Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano, as recent additions.
It remains to be seen how much screen time Wolfe gets in Wonder Woman, as a good portion of the film takes place off the shores of Themyscira. There’s at least one battle set on the beaches of Themyscira however, which is where Artemis may come into her stride alongside her fellow Amazonians. With Robin Wright as General Antiope shown firing three arrows from a bow simultaneously in the Wonder Woman trailers, Jenkins now has us wondering what Wolfe’s version of Artemis is capable of.
Either way, Wolfe not only fits the bill for the Artemis character, but also the direction for the Wonder Woman movie itself. The film showcases a host of female talent in strong physical roles, once again raising the question as to whether or not women are the future of the DCEU.
Guardians Final Trailer: Russia’s Superhero Squad to the Rescue
Those looking for a different type of superhero movie, away from the films of either the Marvel Cinematic Universe or DC Extended Universe, can find solace in the fact that an international Russian film studio is hoping to launch a very unique superhero franchise of their own. Guardians is the launch pad for that franchise, with Armenian filmmaker Sarik Andreasyan directing this story about a team of Soviet Union-era superheroes that were previously forced to keep their identities a secret.
Alina Lanina, Anton Pampushnyy, Sanzhar Madiyev, Sebastien Sisak and Valeriya Shkirando make up Guardians‘ lead cast, while Andrey Gavrilov wrote the screenplay. If robotic mercenaries, bad-ass fighting scenes and a huge bear with six pack abs is your kind of thing, then Guardians looks set to tick all of your boxes. The two previously-released trailers for the film showcase some of the incredible action scenes we’ll see throughout the film upon its release – and now a final trailer has arrived, showing off more of the most chaotic and even amusing visuals from the movie.
It’s very easy to see where the creators of Guardians got their inspiration in the new footage featured above, but that doesn’t make this release any less exciting. Marvel and DC shouldn’t hold the monopoly when it comes to releasing good superhero movies, so Andreasyan’s film – despite borrowing heavily from the themes and tropes/elements that have been featured prominently throughout the films of the MCU and DCEU thus far – is nonetheless a welcome addition to the larger universe of superhero movies.
Whether or not Guardians will have the pulling power to draw in big crowds remains to be seen. While it would be nice to live in a world where we all give chances to new franchises despite our love for those that have already been well cemented, that’s not how most people operate, especially in the modern-day. That Guardians is non-English film won’t help its prospects stateside, either.
In saying that, a large following has already amassed and circulated around Guardians ahead of its release. It’s fair to say that the buzz and hype surrounding the movie is as high right now as one could reasonably expect – and so with its Russian theatrical release of the movie just around the corner, Guardians may wind up posting some impressive numbers at its native box office before dropping in other countries across the globe over the year ahead.
Guardians is expected to be released in the U.S. at some point this year, following its Russian theatrical debut on February 23rd, 2017.
Guardians Final Trailer: Russia’s Superhero Squad to the Rescue
Educators Shape Minecraft’s Growing Presence in the Classroom
Imagine learning about ancient Egypt and then being able to construct your own pyramid that is accurately scaled. Or, imagine reading Charlotte’s Web and recreating the barnyard to explore on your own.
This is the reality for the 75,000 educators and students around the world who are using Minecraft: Education Edition in their classrooms. These educators aren’t just playing around in the many worlds of Minecraft, but rather are shaping the classroom edition itself.
“We’ve been working really closely with educators who are already using Minecraft in their classroom, educators who are using other games, and educators who haven’t used games at all,” says Deirdre Quarnstrom, Microsoft’s director of Minecraft Education. “They help us understand some of the challenges in bringing a game into the classroom.”
Quarnstrom says this is where features like classroom mode were introduced. Classroom mode allows teachers to see where all students are in the game and gives them the power to bring them all to one location.
Thanks to new teacher-approved features, adding Minecraft to your class has gotten even easier.
Educator-Shaped Updates and Lessons Expand Utility, Creativity
Earlier this year, Microsoft announced some new Minecraft: Education Edition features: Global Pause, a way to take a quick break or transition to another activity; text-to-speech options for in-game chat to boost accessibility; and a new user interface that makes it easier for teachers and students to manage settings.
In January, Microsoft also expanded its Minecraft Mentor team — a group the company works with regularly to improve the game — to 60 educators in 18 different countries.
These mentors offer advice on their favorite activities and are important thought leaders in the Minecraft community.
Since the launch of the education edition in November 2016, Quarnstrom says teachers have been overwhelmingly supportive of one another and more than 100 lesson plan starters have been submitted— some from Minecraft Mentors.
“Minecraft is a game used in education, not an educational game,” says Quarnstrom. “All of the objectives and quests come from educators.”
The pages of lesson plans available on the Minecraft: Education Edition website range from age 3 to over 18 and cover a wide range of topics.
One innovative Language Arts lesson has students creating a kingdom of words where students create buildings that reflect the parts of speech.
“All buildings and places should be designed to reflect the parts of speech they represent,” writes lesson creator Jon Greenberg. “The size and shape of each part of speech should announce their role in crafting a sentence.”
Quarnstrom said she’s continually blown away by how educators have their students use Minecraft for storytelling and sees it as a celebration of the versatility of the tool.
“We’ve intentionally kept it really open and have seen broad implications across K–12,” says Quarnstrom. “We’re really looking forward to seeing how school and teachers continue to utilize it.”
Educators Shape Minecraft’s Growing Presence in the Classroom
Minecraft Xbox One Edition Gets Awaited Problem Solving Update
Minecraft enthusiasts that play the game on Microsoft’s Xbox One console have received a small update recently. Many of them probably unknowingly, have been subjected to a small update which pushed some important fixes into the game. The Minecraft developer also came out with a changelog list which was barely worth calling a list. That being said, the fixes are still very much appreciated and will increase the gameplay value of the game by taking care of some rather annoying problems.
Let’s take a look at what players can expect to see or feel differently in the game, if they haven’t gotten a chance to check out the change log:
- Prior to the fix, the UI tended to mess up the icons for items which weren’t blocks by displaying the wrong LOD. That has now been fixed and will occur no longer in-game.
- Players also reported that nether portals would sometimes take them to places they had no interest in arriving in, but that has been taken care of in update 40.
- When jumping in a tight place, players would often times find themselves falling through the block that they were on. This was especially frustrating but the developers fixed this issue in the latest update.
Just to clear up any confusion, these changes have been made for the Xbox One version of the game. Anyone playing the game on another platform should not have to worry about this update, as it was solely meant for Microsoft’s console.
While the patch is rather small, it does a great job in impacting the game and taking care of some really annoying issues. This once again proves that the smallest issues are the ones causing the most problems. No further information has been disclosed to any potential future updates for the game.
Minecraft Xbox One Edition Gets Awaited Problem Solving Update
Meet the Kids’ Choice Awards Most Talented Attendee
If there was a Kids’ Choice Award for Best Reason for Attending the Kids’ Choice Awards, 8-year-old Juanita would have it in the bag.
The cancer survivor made headlines Saturday evening at the annual slime-infused Nickelodeon event in Los Angeles, hitting the red carpet to photograph some of the night’s biggest stars (including Gwen Stefani, above, and Nickelodeon favorites Kira Kosarin and Mace Coronel, below).
Juanita was sent to the event on behalf of the Pablove Foundation, whose mission is to help fund pediatric cancer research, educate affected families and provide opportunities in the arts for children living with the disease.
Juanita is part of the Pablove Shutterbugs program which, according to the organization’s website, “teach[es] children living with cancer to develop their creative voice through the art of photography.”
This isn’t the first time Juanita taken the red carpet at a glitzy, celeb-filled event by storm: In January, she attended the 2017 Golden Globes, snapping photos of Hollywood’s biggest stars.
According to E! News, Juanita is in remission after battling cancer for almost three years. She’s now back in school attending third-grade classes. She loves taking photos of her dog Charlie, recently learned to ride a bike and spent time last summer taking photography workshops at the Pablove Shutterbugs Alumni Summer Camp.
Summer Online Minecraft Camps Begin June 26
Igniting a passion for technology is the goal of Connected Camps’ online summer camps in coding, game design, architecture, engineering, and survival mode in Minecraft.
The weeklong virtual camps, priced from $69 to $99, commence June 26. There are 30 online camps to choose from, including girls-only options.
“We offer the fun hands-on projects, and cool counselors that you get at a tech camp, but in an online format that is much more affordable and accessible,” said Mimi Ito, Connected Camps co-founder. “We give kids a STEM learning experience at a tenth of the cost of the more traditional summer camps. The online format also means that kids can keep in touch with their new friends and counselors and keep working on projects even after the one-week camps. And, we run a free, moderated Minecraft server that kids can connect to year-round to continue their learning.”
It can be hard for parents to find tech camps that are affordable, work with their kids’ busy schedules and tap into a passion for all things Minecraft, added Katie Salen, Connected Camps co-founder.
“The best way for kids to develop tech skills and interests is through fun and challenging projects with peers and mentors they feel connected with. We run camps that meet kids where they are, catering to interests in games, exploration, and design, as well as girls-only camps.” Salen said. “Connected Camps draws on over a decade of research on STEM learning and online education.”
Campers, ages 8-13, can connect from the convenience of home, and learn in small groups from expert counselors who are passionate about topics like coding, game design, and creative building. Campers learn by doing, creating projects like race courses, cities, automated machines, mazes, and more. All campers receive a personal certificate of completion from their counselor, and can continue learning on the free Kid Club server with counselor-led building and survival challenges, mini games, and clubs for various interests.
“We think of Minecraft as more than just a game,” said Tara Tiger Brown, Connected Camps co-founder. “To us, it is a flexible, design-friendly environment that not only lets the imaginations of kids run wild, but also teaches them about problem solving, programming, and getting along with others.”
Those who purchase one camp are offered a 20% discount on all other camps. In addition, Connected Camps will be giving away a free Piper computer kit — a computer that kids assemble themselves and runs the Raspberry Pi Edition of Minecraft Story — to one lucky camper, who registers by March 19 this year.
To register for camps, enter the giveaway, or for more information, visit connectedcamps.com.
About Connected Camps
Connected Camps is a benefit corporation providing connected learning experiences that foster creativity, problem solving, collaboration and interest-driven learning. Its mission is to build a global online community where kids build, code, play, and learn from one another. Tapping the power of youth tech experts to teach and mentor, Connected Camps has served thousands of kids through its online and community-based programs. Connected Camps is a member of the Connected Learning Alliance, which supports the expansion and influence of a network of educators, experts and youth-serving organizations mobilizing new technology in the service of equity, access and opportunity for all young people.
Josh Gad on His Beauty and the Beast Character: ‘This Film Is One of Inclusiveness’
Josh Gad, who plays LeFou in Disney’s new live-action Beauty and the Beast, is speaking out about the controversy surrounding the movie’s groundbreaking gay moment.
News of the gay character has caused a stir in recent days: In the new movie, LeFou has a crush on his pal, the handsome, self-absorbed villain Gaston (Fast & Furious star Luke Evans) — and LeFou has what Gad calls a “subtle but incredibly effective” scene during the film’s finale that hints at a happily ever after. Gad tells PEOPLE that the moment in the movie teaches an important lesson central to the theme of the film: “Never judging a book by its cover.”
“What I would say is that this film is one of inclusiveness,” the 36-year-old says. “It’s one that has something to offer everyone.”
As news of the twist broke, a theater in Alabama announced it would not screen the movie.
“There is so much fear out there of that which we don’t understand that which we don’t know,” Gad tells PEOPLE.
“And you have a character in Gaston who uses his charm offensive to whip other people into a frenzy to go and attack somebody they’ve never met. Somebody that’s different. Somebody that only represents a danger because [Gaston] says that he represents a danger.”
He adds: “I think that that theme is as relevant today as it was when Beauty and the Beast was first written 300 years ago. So that’s what I hope people take from it.”
Evans weighed in on the controversy at the film’s premiere, saying, “It’s about unity, it’s about never judging a book by its cover.”
“But digging a little deeper and understanding to not be fearful of things you don’t know or people who look a little different to you.”
He added, “Fear is not a good thing to fuel, and Gaston is responsible for that. But he fails — he fails miserably, and everybody finds love. Everyone!”
Josh Gad on His Beauty and the Beast Character: ‘This Film Is One of Inclusiveness’
The Walking Dead’s crap CGI deer looks like it wandered out of Minecraft
We’ve all heard the one about the deer with no eyes, but what do you call a deer with no soul? In The Walking Dead‘s latest episode, ‘Say Yes’, Rick Grimes had his back against a fairground ride, surrounded by zombies, and to escape the situation, he decided to shoot a nearby deer as a fresh-meat distraction. Only problem was, that deer looked like it had wandered straight out of Minecraft.
The glossy cervid in question was at the nadir of uncanny valley. It didn’t catch the light in the right way; it didn’t cast a realistic shadow, it didn’t fit cleanly into the 3D space it was meant to be occupying. It looked about as convincing as Donkey in Shrek. The result is totally jarring, especially considering there was a real-life deer in the second season of The Walking Dead. By comparison, this seventh season seems to be having weird budgeting issues – a lot of money seems to have been spent on making the zombies look as awesome as possible; deer, not so much.
Twitter’s reaction was strong, and there were many pisstakes. Pisstakes like this one:
Actual deer used in this weeks Walking Dead #cgifail #thewalkingdeaduk pic.twitter.com/sp5FUGScj6
— Colin Jellie (@Jelliewobbler) March 6, 2017
And this one:
The Walking Dead has always had cheesy CGI. But they just tried to pass this off as a live deer in tonight’s episode: pic.twitter.com/c6bXZjZkAD
— Bryan Griffith (@Notorious_B_A_G) March 6, 2017
And these ones:
Someone give an Emmy to the deer in @WalkingDead_AMC
Nailed its scene, such realism much actual deer #thewalkingdeaduk pic.twitter.com/Q18vNAHGOP— DingIt TV (@DingItTV) March 6, 2017
I couldn’t believe how realistic that CGI deer was on ‘Dead’ tonight. #WalkingDead #zombies #FearTheDeer pic.twitter.com/2kfXSrL4AS
— Sentient Cow Games (@sentient_cow) March 6, 2017
FX budget cut hard on #WalkingDead #walkingdeaduk #cgi #deer #minesbetter pic.twitter.com/3IQXmc1YVq
— Mark Rayman (@markrayman) March 6, 2017
Other fans couldn’t quite believe how cheap the show looked:
Did the walking dead go back to season one funding with CGI, Jesus that deer… #thewalkingdeaduk #TheWalkingDead pic.twitter.com/9diAA4z9wq
— Paul Edwards (@P_Edwards8) March 6, 2017
And some even thought they could have done a better job:
Applying for the new intern position at @AMC_TV #TheWalkingDeadSeason7 #deer #WalkingDead #TWD #Richonne #CGI #TalkingDead #fakedeer pic.twitter.com/xzxruw73yf
— Ope Aaron (@ope_aaron) March 6, 2017
Deer oh deer.
The Walking Dead’s crap CGI deer looks like it wandered out of Minecraft
‘Beauty and the Beast’ review: Equally dispiriting and enchanting
‘Beauty and the Beast’ review: Equally dispiriting and enchanting
Beauty and the Beast Review
Yes, Disney has already given us live-action versions of animated films like Alice in Wonderland, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty and The Jungle Book in recent years — and lest we forget, this isn’t a brand-new idea (101 Dalmatians!) — but in a way, Beauty and the Beast feels like the riskiest of them all so far, as far as potential backlash is concerned. Though now 26 years old, Beauty and the Beast is still much more recent than those other animated classics, and many can clearly remember growing up during the film’s initial release and explosion in popularity. Simply put, it has more of a “This movie is mine” feel among some fans, who could be quite upset if this new version isn’t handled well.
Fortunately, it’s handled very well indeed. Screenwriters Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos and director Bill Condon have done a commendable job of taking the 1991 animated movie and delivering what fans want, while also offering enough tweaks to not feel like a note for note copy offering nothing new.
Let’s be clear though, you know exactly what to expect from the storyline here, in all the most meaningful ways. The Beast (Dan Stevens) is a vain, casually cruel prince punished by a curse that has transformed him into a monster, and Belle (Emma Watson) is the book-loving local girl looking for more than her small village can provide. And so begins some imprisonment, unexpected bonding moments, and a love story for the ages!
As a huge fan of the animated film, I felt a tremendous sense of relief simply watching the opening number, “Belle,” performed. Once you get past the “Hey, it’s Emma Watson dressed up like Belle!” aspect, it’s easy to simply sit back and enjoy a well executed, lively version of a great song, and realize this is a film made with a lot of love and care for the source material.
Beauty and the Beast is expertly cast, beginning with the title characters. Watson brings her innate intelligent, thoughtful nature to Belle (being typecast as a voracious reader isn’t the worst thing), while Stevens — balancing the tricky nature of a mo-cap, CG-enhanced performance — brings the right bitter, yet still soulful feel to the Beast. Though it should be said that while no fault of Stevens, but rather some questionable wig and costume choices, the character is amusingly goofier looking as the long-haired prince than as the Beast… but some would say that the same goes in the animated version.
Also integral to this story, of course, are the staff in the Beast’s castle, who have all been transformed into household items by the curse. It’s impossible to imagine Disney’s Beauty and the Beast without Lumiere, Cogsworth or Mrs. Potts, and with top notch digital effects and the voices of excellent actors like Ewan McGregor, Ian McKellan and Emma Thompson playing them, these characters vividly come to life, as do Madame de Garderobe (Audra McDonald), Chip (Nathan Mack), Plumette (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) and the newly-created Maestro Cadenza (Stanley Tucci), a composer transformed into a harpsichord.
The cast also includes Kevin Kline, giving a sweet, sympathetic performance as Belle’s father, Maurice – and while it’s easy to be amused by a character with what is basically an American accent (Kline sounds like he is slightly tweaking his usual accent) being the father to a girl with a British accent, while both of them are supposed to be French, just remember folks, this is musical featuring a singing candelabra. It can survive the additional heightened reality of varied accents.
Last but not least are Luke Evans and Josh Gad as Gaston and LeFou, who in many ways are the scene stealers in Beauty and the Beast. Thanks to Book of Mormon and Frozen, Gad is a proven commodity when it comes to musical-comedy and gives a wonderfully energetic performance here. Evans in the meantime is a big surprise, showing off much more wit than his work in films like The Hobbit trilogy, Fast & Furious 6 or Dracula Untold hinted at.
There’s been a lot of press recently about the decision to make LeFou gay in this version, and give him an obvious crush on Gaston – though it should be noted it’s more of a small subplot/character thread, on par with Lumiere and Plumette being in love, than a major part of the film. It’s a tweak that blends well with the established material/character and beyond that, LeFou does have a more notable arc than in the animated version, where he was simply Gaston’s toady.
There are other expansions and alterations from the animated film here as well, including learning more about both Belle and the Beast’s parents and how it helped shape who these two kindred spirits are. While the story’s fantastical elements can never make it feel truly “realistic,” these touches certainly help to ground and flesh out the characters in some key areas.
As for the musical numbers, they are by and large great, with Condon proving to be an excellent choice to guide the film. The director’s eclectic career includes Gods and Monsters, Kinsey, a Candyman sequel and two Twilight sequels, but his work on two Academy Award-winning musicals, Chicago (which he wrote) and Dreamgirls (which he both wrote and directed), certainly serves him well here. The film is gorgeous to look at and the musical numbers are dynamic and involving, with many echoes of the animated film, but not feeling beholden to repeat every single bit of choreography. Small changes go beyond the visuals to the lyrics themselves, as purists should be warned there are some alternations from this songs you’ve sung along to for years, as this film makes use of a few lines written by the late Howard Ashman for the animated film that weren’t used at the time.
All the actors do solid to excellent work on the singing side. Watson, the one with the least musical theater background, isn’t likely to suddenly launch a second career as a pop singer, but still more than holds her own alongside Stevens, giving numbers like “Belle” and “Something There” plenty of emotion, as does Thompson with the title track. As for the crowd-pleasing “Be Our Guest,” any Moulin Rouge fan will love hearing McGregor belt out the tune and the number retains its inherent charm and fun – but it doesn’t quite hit the mark like it does in the animated version. It’s the one sequence where you feel the disconnect between Watson sitting there as a real person and all of the CG characters performing around her. The fact that they don’t truly feel like they’re occupying the same space stops it from completely gelling.
The showstopper instead is reserved for the aforementioned pairing of Evans and Gad, whose rousing rendition of the song “Gaston” thrills – and led to the biggest applause at the press screening I attended.
Unfortunately, the handful of new songs, written by Ashman’s collaborator Alan Menken alongside Tim Rice, are a bit on the lackluster side. While I did enjoy “”How Does a Moment Last Forever,” a short and poignant number performed by Kline, other new inclusions “Days in the Sun” and “Evermore” feel a bit uninspired and hard to recall after the fact.
While it doesn’t rise to the heights of last year’s tremendous version of The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast is far from the artistic misfire of Alice in Wonderland when it comes to Disney’s current love of turning their animated classics into live-action. Powered by Bill Condon’s direction and terrific performances from a game cast, it’s a lovely film that includes the elements fans of the animated classic would hope to see, while also introducing some new aspects that, by and large, effortlessly fit in with the original story’s framework and yet feel appropriate as far as both expanding and grounding the characters and their world.
And you’ll find it very hard to not go home humming or singing “Gaston.”
Review: Disney’s ‘Beauty And The Beast’ Gets Lost In Translation
The Box Office:
Walt Disney’s Beauty and the Beast hits theaters in North America (and elsewhere) on March 17, 2017. The film is the latest in one of the Mouse House’s most valuable would-be franchises. What started as a “wow” moment with Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland (2010), which made $1.025 billion worldwide, thanks to a well-timed release date and spectacular director, concept and stars, has now morphed into a regular feature of the Disney playbook. And the only question is whether this $160 million-budgeted live action/CGI hybrid fantasy will become the fairest one of all.
For the record, it is entirely possible for me to argue that this Bill Condon-directed adaptation of the 1991 animated feature has a solid shot at becoming one of the highest-grossing movies of the year while swearing up-and-down that it doesn’t have to clear $1 billion to be considered a success. But as this is the first one of these live-action adaptations to retell a more contemporary Disney animated feature, we’re getting a comparatively unprecedented shot of nostalgia and multi-generational interest.
You’ve got adults who grew up with the Oscar-nominated toon, kids who will come to this either with fresh eyes and everyone in between. Oh, and toss in Emma Watson as the title character, just as the kids who grew up with Harry Potter are coming of age, and you have a financial concoction so perfect it borders on evil. Including the 2012 3D reissue and not accounting for inflation, the original toon has earned $216 million domestic and $424m worldwide. It will be fun to see how quickly that figure gets trounced by this new variation. Say what you will about Disney’s diabolical doings, but if it gets them the money to make the likes of Pete’s Dragon and Queen of Katwe, then be my guest!
The Review:
Walt Disney’s Beauty and the Beast is the first of these newfangled live-action fairy tale adaptations that feels motivated purely by financial whims. The live-action adaptation of the 1991 animated musical is less of a new interpretation of an old text than a straight remake of a popular movie purely because that previous film was popular. It is a celebrity cover band version of the animated movie, intended primarily to milk nostalgia and cross-generational interest. Yet it is burdened by length-padding digressions, miscasting, a choppy narratives and an emotional detachment that only highlights that icky subtexts within.
One of the core problems, believe it or not, is Emma Watson as the title character. Even with slight revisions to make Belle more of a master of her own destiny, this is still not the healthiest romance ever told. Unlike, say, Twilight or Fifty Shades of Grey, it is a romance that begins absent consent and without equal agency. And Watson can’t quite sell her own acceptance of this narrative. Like Jodie Foster in Anna and the King, Watson can’t quite dumb herself down to the level of buying it.
Belle is much more engaged when she’s fending off Gaston (Luke Evans) or conversing with her father (Kevin Kline). She looks unsure of how to react when she’s watching a bunch of silverware put on a dinner theater or falling for a relatively charmless Beast (Dan Stevens, with a great singing voice even if I kept thinking of Colm Wilkinson’s Jean Valjean). The film is much stronger, at least as surface-level entertainment, in the village sequences, where good actors are conversing with each other, as opposed to Beast’s castle where good actors do their best to bring visually displeasing CGI creations to life.
What works fine in animation–the various anthropomorphic dishes and tea cups singing and dancing–comes off as awkward in live-action. Much of the Beast’s castle is visually drab and ugly, in contrast to the bright and vibrant village sequences. That may be intentional, but since much of the film takes place in said location, it’s akin to a horror movie set in a single poorly-lit locale. Further muddying the waters is a series of digressions and complications that stretch the film to over two hours while offering little beyond undoing what was a fat-free and airtight screenplay of logical cause-and-effect.
We get a new subplot explaining, in detail, what happened to Belle’s mother and Gaston gets more scenes with Belle’s dad, which only serves to overly complicate Gaston’s third-act machinations. While more Kevin Kline is a good thing, the extraneous material and altered emphasis has two significant consequences. They make Gaston much more interesting than anyone else onscreen while pushing the Beast himself into a narrative corner until the film’s second half. Both sabotage what should be the movie’s core dramatic arc.
Luke Evans is pretty great as Gaston, and he is almost sympathetic until the story demands that he cross a clear moral line. Sure, he’s a take on the proverbial “nice guy,” but Evans imbues him with a certain level-headed charm and an awareness of societal injustices. That he’s totally okay with his best pal (Josh Gad) nursing an obvious crush on him makes him that much more endearing for the first half of the picture. Besides, he’s comparatively better than the abusive monster who locks women in cages.
This live-action version emphasizes one of the big problems with the animated film, namely that the Beast and his servants assume that that just because Belle is an attractive young girl that she might be “the one” to break their curse. They expect her to fall for him with just a token amount of effort. All due sympathy in regard to their cursed state, but every single action they take is self-serving. Beast saves Belle from the wolves not because he does a mitzvah but because it is in his interest for her to not die. Ditto the candlestick and the teapot and the feather duster all making Belle feel at home and trying to convince her that the abrasive, monstrous head of the household isn’t all that bad. It’s not quite gaslighting, but it’s close.
The Beast himself is largely absent in the film’s first half, until it is time for him to soften up and woo his would-be bride. Due to an arbitrary restructuring of certain plot points and dialogue exchanges (the library reveal is basically accidental), the Beast comes across as less sympathetic. This only highlights the fact that Beauty and the Beast is arguably something of a bodice-ripping Harlequin romance story squeezed into a G-rated bottle.
What works in the animated movie just doesn’t travel into the live-action realm. And that’s a problem considering Bill Condon’s core mission is to turn the animated feature into a live-action romantic fantasy. Unlike the previous live-action fairy tale adaptations, the ones I liked (Pete’s Dragon, Cinderella) and the ones I didn’t (Maleficent, Alice in Wonderland), this doesn’t even add anything to the mythology or bring anything new to the table.
It’s a deluge of good actors (including Ian McKellen, Emma Thompson, Ewan McGregor, Audra McDonald, Stanley Tucci and Gugu Mbatha-Raw) trying their best in what amounts to a cover band of a popular album. The new version feels obligatory rather than narratively organic, with the core romance feeling unearned. The love story plays out merely because all parties know how the plot must go. All we can do is simply admire the visual elements, the pomp and circumstance and the new variations on iconic beats.
And, source material fidelity notwithstanding, I’d like to think we’ve advanced a bit beyond the whole “that mean creepy dude is really a sweetheart once you get to know him” trope. On one hand, that’s the story. But it says something about our addiction to nostalgia that we keep having to tweak old stories so that they are slightly more palpable to modern audiences.
Since the Mouse House is going to make a fortune on this one, I think I can admit that I was never a huge fan of the 1991 film for much of the same reasons, namely the notion of rewarding the Beast for the initial act of kidnapping a young girl and being cruel to her. We can at least acknowledge something unsavory about the stories that are chosen as the next mega-bucks blockbuster.
If you argue that I’m overly harsh, it’s partly because I know Walt Disney can do better in this specific sandbox and I don’t feel the need to be too charitable to a movie that’s going to make a gazillion dollars anyway. My daughter liked it just fine, and I’m glad that I saw it in an environment with enough kids in the audience to observe their reactions. My critical opinion on this one is going to matter as much as my pan of Illumination’s Sing, which I made a point to see in that #SingSaturday national sneak preview, and I suppose that’s okay.
This new version accidentally accentuates the icky text at the core of the story while the plot alterations cause confusion and delay. If I was overly harsh on The Force Awakens partly because I feared it would unleash a deluge of glorified remake-quels, I also worry that the Mouse House will look at the success of this carbon copy revamp and choose to go in that direction instead of the likes of Pete’s Dragon and Cinderella. Nonetheless, Beauty and the Beast is among the lesser entries in Disney’s recent live-action fairy tale theater.
Review: Disney’s ‘Beauty And The Beast’ Gets Lost In Translation
Sweden uses Minecraft for urban planning
Swedish National Land survey has put its maps on Minecraft to promote its work
Tideström introduced the idea of a Minecraft Sweden in August 2015, and the complete map of Sweden and individual maps of each of its 290 municipalities were released to the public four months later. “For a governmental department, we completed the project very fast,” said Tideström. Lantmäteriet had a small internal team working on the project while the map data was converted to Minecraft by outside consultants using FME mapping tools.
The maps have gathered over 19,000 downloads to date, but Tideström believes their reach is far wider through the visibility of the project and the use of the maps in various other projects, such as a competition for schools to design a future city in the municipality of Kiruna.
“We were surprised that municipalities and organisations have started to use Minecraft as an actual planning tool for city development and have a dialogue with citizens,” said Tideström. “It is an easy way to translate maps into 3D, which makes it far easier for people to see how their city will look.”
The project, which cost an estimated kr400,000 (£36,000), has also received an accolade from the IT community, winning Digital Project of the Year at the Swedish CIO Awards.
Sweden is not the first country to recreate itself in Minecraft. Denmark and Norway have previously had similar projects, but Tideström said Lantmäteriet has gone a step further with the granular data the maps offer, from roads and lakes to forests and grasslands.
Lantmäteriet used the earlier project in Denmark for benchmarking, namely in opting for downloadable maps instead of a server-based approach. “In Denmark, they had an open server so people could log in and play,” said Tideström. “They had big problems with houses being torn down by players.”
The Swedish maps are available in 8×8 metre resolution (each Minecraft block is equivalent to eight meters). While this means small file sizes for downloading, the maps are more suitable for roaming the landscape than building detailed houses. To address this Lantmäteriet has so far launched four municipalities in a higher (1×1) resolution to enable more creativity.
“In some areas, schoolkids have built the whole centre of a town so it looks like real life, with the right textures and colours,” said Tideström.
Tideström said the Minecraft project hasn’t faced any major technical issues, but it has had an impact on Lantmäteriet’s approach to IT projects. The agency is now encouraging more experiments and fast deployments in addition to traditional large-scale projects.
“We realised if we would have taken this project through our normal process of driving things, we would have released it in 2018 or 2019,” he said. “We are now looking into how we can change this prioritisation and act faster with the deployment of ideas.”
“We were going to launch some maps as open data and I thought it would be great to do it on Minecraft, and our managers liked the idea,” Bobo Tideström, business developer at the Lantmäteriet, told Computer Weekly.
Competitive Minecraft Players Will Battle on the Big Screen
Young gamers will take to the big screen this weekend to battle for the right to represent Denver at qualifiers for the first-evee.
Organized by Santa Monica-based Super League Gaming, Minecraft City Champs is a season-long competition that pits teams from twelve cities against each other across seven different Minecraft game modes. (A thirteenth team, the Virtual Storm, is made up of players that don’t live in an area with its own squad.) To earn a place on Colorado’s team, the Denver Drakes, players will have to qualify at a series of four weekly events.
For those not familiar with the phenomenon, Minecraft is a sandbox-style game that has players gather resources, create structures and attempt to survive in a blocky, pixellated landscape. The title has established itself as a favorite both of parents, who value it for its pseudo-educational, Lego-esque gameplay, and older players, who have used the platform to build everything from a working Game Boy to a model of Kings Landing from Game of Thrones.
This isn’t Super League Gaming’s first foray into this type of tournament. Last year, the company tested the model with a similar tournament for the popular eSports game League of Legends. In the fall, SLG held competitive Minecraft events in more than fifty cities across the U.S., with the best players entering into a nationwide tournament with a college scholarship as the prize.
Unlike the Minecraft tournament, SLG’s League of Legends competition allows players over seventeen.
While Minecraft doesn’t have the same reputation as a competitive game as popular eSports titles like League of Legends, DOTA 2, or Counter-Strike: Global Offensive — whose tournaments tempt pros with prize pools that can reach well into eight figures — SLG said in an e-mail that it aims to offer “a positive place for Minecraft fans to come together and experience the spotlight on the big screen.”
“The first League of Legends City Champs showed how intense local pride can be in gaming, and we want to bring that intensity to even more players across America,” said Super League Gaming CEO Ann Hand in a press release. “Adding a Minecraft tournament alongside League of Legends and expanding the number of cities are our next steps to bringing the big-screen gaming experience to everyone.”
Tickets to compete in the qualifiers are $20 per event. All players receive a free City Champs t-shirt; the highest-ranked will go on to compete against Seattle and Chicago in the City vs. City phase.
The first qualifications will take place today, Saturday, March 11, at 10:30 a.m. at Boulder’s Century 16 theater; participants must be seventeen or younger.
Minecraft enthusiasts compete in Boulder tournament
BOULDER – Playing video games on the big screen might sound like a dream to many kids.
That dream became a reality for some on Saturday who faced off in Super League Game’s event Minecraft City Champs.
The group of Minecraft enthusiasts faced off in Minecraft themed games including capture the flag and soccer.
The tournament is still in the qualifying rounds. The top finishers of the Denver Drakes team will face off against the champions from other cities around the country.
There will be three additional qualifying rounds that will be held at the 16 Century Theatre in Boulder.
The remaining events will be held every Saturday morning through April 1 at 10:30 a.m., with the championship round taking place this summer. Anyone from age 6-16 is eligible for the competition.
For more information, or to register for the remaining rounds, click here.
Council for Economic Education Releases New Content for Minecraft Education
The New York-based Council for Economic Education (CEE) has released new content for Minecraft: Education Edition, produced by Mojang and Microsoft.
Last week, CEE released two free Minecraft lesson plans providing teachers in grades 3 to 5 nationwide the opportunity to further engage their students on the subject of economics via one of the most popular games in the world.
The lesson plans are designed for students to explore how to make smart economic choices in a team setting. When playing Minecraft, groups of students will evaluate the costs and benefits to help determine the types of resources needed to build a structure. In turn, when they’ve created a structure in Minecraft, they will reflect on how their economic decisions made a positive or negative impact on their built environment.
“Only 20 states require students to take a course in high school economics and it’s our mission to ensure kids at every age are given the opportunity to learn key economic concepts,” said Nan Morrison, CEO and president of CEE, in a statement. “Using Minecraft is a fun and easy way to teach kids about fundamental life skills —choices, costs and benefits — all core principles of economics.”
CEE will continue to develop free Minecraft lesson plans tied to economic concepts for teachers to use in the classroom. To view the two free lesson plans, visit these sites:
Teachers can sign up for a trial of Minecraft: Education Edition by visiting the Minecraft Education website.
CEE is a nonprofit organization that focuses on the economic and financial education of K–12 students. The organization provides free economic and personal finance lessons and resources for educators at its site EconEdLink.
Council for Economic Education Releases New Content for Minecraft Education
Enter to win Flynn’s Log 1 in Paperback
Enter by Oct 31